{"id":49114,"date":"2024-06-05T18:20:00","date_gmt":"2024-06-05T18:20:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/indepthmag.com\/?p=49114"},"modified":"2024-06-06T02:58:00","modified_gmt":"2024-06-06T02:58:00","slug":"alternative-rebreather-configurations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/indepthmag.com\/alternative-rebreather-configurations\/","title":{"rendered":"When Sidemount Becomes the Solution"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Reprinted from GUE\u2019s QUEST Vol 25 No <\/em>2. Text and photos by Kirill Egorov. <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Starting in 2008, and for a few years thereafter, GUE began to seriously investigate the feasibility of introducing CCR courses into the curriculum. Initially, a lot of senior instructors were relatively reluctant; but as helium became more expensive and less available, and our projects took us to deeper and more remote locations, the use of closed-circuit rebreathers looked more and more promising. Eventually, the JJ-CCR was chosen, and Richard Lundgren drove the development of the CCR program with his usual determination. As a result, we released our closed-circuit rebreather diver program, GUE CCR, in 2013.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As a base configuration for the class and for all GUE related activities, Richard suggested backmounted, manifolded tanks for diluent and a back-mounted oxygen tank. The logic behind this configuration seems unbeatable to me to this day, and it remains my main configuration of choice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The GUE CCR standard configuration<\/strong><\/a> certainly has advantages: <\/p>\n\n\n\n